Page 102 - 《橡塑技术与装备》英文版2026年2期
P. 102

HINA R&P  TECHNOLOGY  AND EQUIPMENT




           area remaining equal before and after compression. After   E=6(C 10 +C 01 ) and indicating that additional correction is
           compression, the short axis of the ellipse is b and the long axis   required to control the error within 5% under large strain.
           is a. Therefore, the short axis of the ellipse, b=R(1-ε)the initial   Research on O-rings for shield machines shows that when the
           circular cross-sectional area, and the compressed elliptical   compression rate is between 10% and 25%, the contact stress is
                              2
           cross-sectional area are πR  , and respectively. According to the   linearly correlated with strain. The linear correction form can
           conservation of area πab, the long axis a of the ellipse is:  control the prediction error within 7%, supporting 1+2.5ε the
                        π ab = π R 2   ⇒  a =  R             engineering applicability of the correction term. The extended
                                   1 ε                                   (9)
                                    −
               (3) Radius of curvature                       Mooney-Rivlin model further verifies the universality of the
               For the compressed elliptical cross-section, contact occurs   strain correction term, and its results are highly consistent with
           at the vertex of the ellipse (the maximum deformation point   experimental data on rubber. In summary, the strain correction
           under axial compression), with a radius of curvature being:  term adopted in this paper has both experimental and
                                  R  2                     theoretical support, and is well compatible with the mechanical
                                 a 2    1 ε    R              (10)  laws of rubber materials. Therefore, the equivalent elastic
                                  −
                         ∗
                        R =   =       =
                            b   R −  )  (1 ε ) 3             modulus E is:
                                 (1 ε
                                         −
                                                                     *
           1.3  Equivalent elastic modulus                                                 E =6(C 10 +C 01 ) (1+2.5ε)                      (14)
                                                                              *
                The elastic modulus E, C10, and C01 coefficients of   Based on equations (1) to (14), the contact width of the
           rubber can be determined based on the hardness HA of rubber   O-ring is:
           according to the following formula:                           FR ∗  d  2(C + C  )ε + 3(C +  3C  )ε 
                                                                                                  2
                                                                           3
                             15.75 2.15H                       w =  2  *  =    10  3  01  10  01  
                                 +
                                                                                            +
                                                                               −
                                     E =  A                               (11)  π E  12(1 ε )  (C + C 01 )(1 2.5 ) ε         (15)
                                                                                     10
                                  −
                               100 H A
                                                   C 01 =0.25C 10                                                     (12)  2  Geometric simulation model
                                                 E=6(C 10 +C 01 )                              (13)
                                                                 Taking a certain intelligent sliding sleeve as an example,
               In the formula, C 10  and C 01  represent the Mooney-Rivlin   the O-ring is placed in the sealing groove of the part, and the
           parameters.
                                                             sealing type is static sealing. The sealing is achieved by the
               The elastic modulus of rubber materials exhibits
                                                             deformation of the O-ring under pressure, as shown in figure
           significant strain nonlinearity under large deformation,   1. The O-ring is prone to damage during assembly, and its
           necessitating the introduction of correction terms to enhance
                                                             compression rate is only affected by the space reserved in the
           model accuracy. Through static tensile tests on nitrile
                                                             structure. This article analyzes the sealing performance of the
           rubber, a fitting was obtainedC 10 =0.115 9 MPa,C 01 =0.0.214   O-ring and studies the contact width and mechanical properties
           7 MPa, validating the rationality of the basic elastic modulus   of the O-ring under different compression rates.



             1-Outer joint, 2-Upper joint, 3-Spindle, 4-Outer cylinder, 5-Storage chamber sub, 6-Motion sub, 7-Inner sliding sleeve, 8-Outer sliding sleeve, 9-Circular cross-
                                       section helical compression spring, 10-O-shaped rubber sealing ring
                                           Figure 1 2D model of smart slide cover
               Given that both the O-ring and the sealing groove   The finite element simulation analysis of the O-ring was
           exhibit axisymmetric characteristics, to simplify calculations   conducted using ANSYS software. The O-ring selected for the
           and enhance efficiency, the three-dimensional solid model   simulation was a 2-331 standard part produced by Parker, with
           is simplified to a two-dimensional axisymmetric model, as   an inner diameter of 56.52 mm and a diameter of 5.33 mm.
           illustrated in figure 2.                          Considering the characteristics of the petroleum downhole


           ·58·                                                                           Vol.52,No.2
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107